Research paper outline

Subject: Controversial speaker
Topic:
The effect of allowing international controversial speakers give a public speaking relate to national relationship

Research question:
Are international controversial speakers should be allowed to give a public speaking in different countries?

Thesis statement:
Controversial speakers should not be allowed to give a public speaking in different countries because it action encourage non-government organization interfere political issue of another country, give a bad sign in national relationship and result in a unfriendly treatment through the media.

Briefly introduction
What is controversial speaker? Who is defined as controversial speaker? What did they do?

Topic1:
Controversial speakers will mislead foreign audiences so that foreign non-government interfered China’s domestic political issue.

Supporting details:
Some of the controversial speakers attempt to interfere political issue of their country. For example, dalailama, one of the most powerful religion leaders in Tibetan Buddhism, traveled round countries over the world to sell his idea for split Tibet from China. He grabs the gap between cultures and make foreigner believe China did bad thing on Tibet. He got help from foreign non-government organizations and infests the sacred flame transition at 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Based on the report, this organization comes from France. At that time, Chinese really did not like French because they did bad thing.

Topic 2: The speaking used to make a country give a bad sign to China.
Example: Dalailama used to be received by the president of France, Nicolas Sarkozy. Chinese protested his decision.

Topic3: Foreign media distort the fact of rioting happened in China because they has prejudices of China’s government.
Example: Germany N-TV announced a picture as “the new protest in Tibet” but actually the picture got from Nepel. http://media.people.com.cn/GB/40699/7055226.html
Chinese people are extremely angry by these news, they will also create prejudice to German.

Conclusion:
Sometimes foreign people really give difficult time of China to deal with Chinese political issue. Due to different background we have, they believe things look like logical and rational. However, indeed, their belief is confused, and what they did corrupt Chinese national image. Therefore, controversial speaking should not be allowed in the public.